Game Reviews
Story-driven games that evolve across many sessions as you alter the board and rules, with how long each campaign runs and what you commit to.
There is a particular thrill the first time a game tells you to tear up a card or write on the board. It feels like vandalism and it feels like permission, both at once. That tension is the whole appeal of legacy and campaign games, the corner of the hobby that asks you to commit to a story rather than a single evening.
As a designer by training, I find these games fascinating and occasionally frustrating. When the pacing is right, the long arc makes every session feel consequential. When it's wrong, you spend hours on setup and bookkeeping for a payoff that never lands. Here are the ones I think are worth your months, and an honest word on what each one asks of you.
People use these terms interchangeably, but the distinction shapes your whole experience. A legacy game changes permanently. You apply stickers, destroy cards, and unlock sealed boxes that you can never re-seal. A campaign game tells a connected story across sessions but generally resets, so a second group can play the same arc fresh.
That difference is not trivia. It decides whether you can hand the game to a friend afterward, whether a missed player can be swapped out, and whether a bad run can be undone. Before you buy, ask yourself which model fits your table. A flaky group that meets when it can will struggle with a true legacy box, where every absence and reset has weight.
Legacy games trade replayability for the feeling that your choices are written into the cardboard. That trade is exhilarating once, and only once.
The flagship of the genre remains Pandemic Legacy, which spreads a single tense year across roughly a dozen to two dozen sessions depending on how often you lose. It takes the cooperative disease-fighting loop and layers a story on top, with boxes and envelopes that open as the year unravels. If your group has never tried a campaign, this is the cleanest on-ramp, partly because the base game is already a well-loved cooperative experience.
Gloomhaven sits at the other extreme. It is enormous, both in box weight and in the hundred-plus scenarios its campaign can stretch across. The combat is genuinely excellent, a hand-management puzzle that rewards clever play, but the setup and teardown each session are a real tax on your evening. I adore it, and I also understand every group that bounced off the sheer bulk of it. Its lighter cousin, Frosthaven, doubles down on everything, for better and worse.
If those sound daunting, Jaws of the Lion trims the same combat system into a campaign you can finish in a season, with a built-in tutorial that teaches as you go. I recommend it constantly to people who love tactics but fear commitment.
There's also Pandemic Legacy: Season 2, which builds on the formula with a different feel, and the various sequels and reprints that keep the genre fresh. The point is that the on-ramps have gotten gentler over the years. You no longer have to start with the heaviest possible box to taste what a campaign offers, and starting lighter is usually the wiser move for a group's first attempt.
Not every great campaign demands a calendar year. Some of my favorites wrap in a handful of evenings, which makes them far easier to actually finish, and a finished campaign beats a brilliant one abandoned at session four.
These shorter boxes are where I'd point a group that doubts its own stamina. Finishing the story is its own reward, and a tight arc rarely outstays its welcome.
The marketing always sells the story. It rarely mentions the logistics, and the logistics are what sink most campaigns. Before you open one of these, be honest about a few things.
I bring this up because I've watched promising campaigns die not from a weak game but from a group that simply drifted apart. Pick your players before you pick your box.
A note on age suitability, since these boxes often span a wide range of themes and reading loads: defer to the publisher's stated range printed on the box rather than the marketing. A campaign with light combat and a friendly story can suit a family, while one with denser bookkeeping or darker themes is squarely an adult affair. Match the box to the people actually sitting at your table.
The honest truth is that a campaign is a gamble on your own attention. You're betting that twenty hours from now you'll still care about this story and these people around the table. The best games in this genre stack the deck in your favor by making each session feel like it moved something real.
What separates a great legacy box from a tedious one is whether the changes feel earned. When a sticker you placed three weeks ago suddenly matters, when a character you've nursed through six scenarios finally breaks through, the format sings. When the changes are just busywork dressed as story, you feel every minute of the runtime. Choose the games where your fingerprints are all over the board by the end, and you'll understand why people speak about these campaigns the way they speak about a good season of television.
Lucía has a shelf that is, by any reasonable measure, too full of board games. She writes reviews and strategy guides with a designer's eye for what makes a game tick, and she is honest about the ones that overstay their welcome.
Keep reading
Well-loved games whose runtime drags past the fun, with honest notes on where each one sags and house rules that trim the dead time.
Lucía Castro
Compact card games that punch far above their box size, easy to pack and quick to teach, with what makes each one a travel and cafe favorite.
Felix Monroe